DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Zastava Yugo vs 2000 Perodua Kenari Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZastavaMakePerodua
YugoModelKenari
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
155 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1116 ccEngine displacement989 cc
54 HPPower56 HP
78 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption5,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145 R13Tyre size155/65 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3490 mmLength3460 mm
1540 mmWidth1475 mm
1340 mmHeight1665 mm
790 KgWeight845 Kg
2150 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Zastava Yugo and 2000 Perodua Kenari approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…