2005 • Zastava
Yugo
Zastava Yugo 0.9 (45 Hp) 2005Overall Score40.5/100
2005 Zastava Yugo vs 2004 Smart Crossblade Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Smart
Crossblade
Smart Crossblade 0.6 i (70 Hp) 2004Overall Score39.5/100
WINNER
Zastava Yugo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
40.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Zastava YugoSpecificationSmart Crossblade
ZastavaMakeSmart
YugoModelCrossblade
2005Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3Doors2
Performance
Zastava YugoSpecificationSmart Crossblade
20,1 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
135 km/hTop speed135 km/h
903 ccEngine displacement599 cc
45 HPPower70 HP
63 NmTorque100 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Zastava YugoSpecificationSmart Crossblade
PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank22 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Zastava YugoSpecificationSmart Crossblade
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
135/85 R13Tyre size195/40 R16; 215/35 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Zastava YugoSpecificationSmart Crossblade
3490 mmLength2500 mm
1540 mmWidth1515 mm
1340 mmHeight1549 mm
750 KgWeight730 Kg
2150 mmWheelbase1812 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Zastava Yugo and 2004 Smart Crossblade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…