2000 • Zastava
Yugo
Zastava Yugo 0.9 (45 Hp) 2000Overall Score37.5/100
2000 Zastava Yugo vs 1996 Citroen AX Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Citroen
AX
Citroen AX 1.0 (45 Hp) 1996Overall Score38.5/100
WINNER
Citroen AX
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
37.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Zastava YugoSpecificationCitroen AX
ZastavaMakeCitroen
YugoModelAX
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Zastava YugoSpecificationCitroen AX
20,1 s0–100 km/h17,9 s
135 km/hTop speed145 km/h
903 ccEngine displacement954 cc
45 HPPower45 HP
63 NmTorque72 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Zastava YugoSpecificationCitroen AX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank43 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption—
—Average consumption4,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Zastava YugoSpecificationCitroen AX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
135/85 R13Tyre size145/70 R13
Dimensions
Zastava YugoSpecificationCitroen AX
3490 mmLength3525 mm
1540 mmWidth1555 mm
1340 mmHeight1355 mm
750 KgWeight668 Kg
2150 mmWheelbase2280 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Zastava Yugo and 1996 Citroen AX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen AX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…