DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Wiesmann Roadster vs 2017 BMW X6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW X6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

88.5–88.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

WiesmannMakeBMW
RoadsterModelX6
2014Model year2017
RoadsterBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

4,9 s0–100 km/h6,4 s
255 km/hTop speed240 km/h
3246 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
325 HPPower306 HP
350 NmTorque400 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank85 lt
—Urban consumption11,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,9 lt
11 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8 Steptronic
215/50 R17Tyre size255/50 R19; 285/45 R19; 275/40 R20; 315/35 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3860 mmLength4909 mm
1750 mmWidth1989 mm
1160 mmHeight1702 mm
1180 KgWeight2025 Kg
2990 mmWheelbase2933 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Wiesmann Roadster and 2017 BMW X6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW X6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…