DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Wiesmann Roadster vs 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Range Rover

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

88.5–88.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

WiesmannMakeLand Rover
RoadsterModelRange Rover
2014Model year2017
RoadsterBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

4,9 s0–100 km/h7,4 s
255 km/hTop speed209 km/h
3246 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
325 HPPower340 HP
350 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank103 lt
—Urban consumption13,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,5 lt
11 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
215/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3860 mmLength5000 mm
1750 mmWidth—
1160 mmHeight1869 mm
1180 KgWeight2256 Kg
2990 mmWheelbase2922 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Wiesmann Roadster and 2017 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Range Rover leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…