DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Wiesmann Roadster vs 2003 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

WiesmannMakeChrysler
RoadsterModelConcorde
2003Model year2003
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,0 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
225 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2793 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
193 HPPower203 HP
280 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/50 R17Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3860 mmLength5310 mm
1750 mmWidth1900 mm
1160 mmHeight1420 mm
995 KgWeight1570 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Wiesmann Roadster and 2003 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…