DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo XC90 vs 2009 Chevrolet Trailblazer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Trailblazer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeChevrolet
XC90ModelTrailblazer
2013Model year2009
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed175 km/h
4414 ccEngine displacement4157 cc
315 HPPower295 HP
440 NmTorque375 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank94 lt
19,8 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
9,6 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt
13,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears4
—Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4798 mmLength5279 mm
1898 mmWidth1895 mm
1743 mmHeight1957 mm
2080 KgWeight2305 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase3277 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo XC90 and 2009 Chevrolet Trailblazer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Trailblazer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…