DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Volvo XC90 vs 2010 Jeep Commander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeJeep
XC90ModelCommander
2011Model year2010
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5/7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
210 km/hTop speed191 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
243 HPPower218 HP
320 NmTorque510 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank78 lt
—Urban consumption13,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,2 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size245/65R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4787 mm
1936 mmWidth1900 mm
1743 mmHeight1826 mm
—Weight2245 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Volvo XC90 and 2010 Jeep Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…