2002 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 3.2 (243 Hp) 2002Overall Score64.75/100
2002 Volvo XC90 vs 2002 Daewoo Musso Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Daewoo
Musso
Daewoo Musso 3.2 24V (220 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Daewoo Musso
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo XC90SpecificationDaewoo Musso
VolvoMakeDaewoo
XC90ModelMusso
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo XC90SpecificationDaewoo Musso
9,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
243 HPPower220 HP
320 NmTorque307 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo XC90SpecificationDaewoo Musso
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption16,9 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo XC90SpecificationDaewoo Musso
4807 mmLength4640 mm
1936 mmWidth1864 mm
1784 mmHeight1735 mm
2218 KgWeight1935 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2630 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Volvo XC90 and 2002 Daewoo Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableDaewoo Musso vs Volvo XC902002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableSsangYong Musso vs Volvo XC902002 and 2002 model years
VSImage unavailableNissan Pathfinder vs Volvo XC902002 and 2002 model years
VSImage unavailableIsuzu Trooper vs Volvo XC902002 and 2002 model years
VSImage unavailableLancia Phedra vs Volvo XC902002 and 2002 model yearsComments are loading…