DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo XC90 vs 2003 SsangYong Chairman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSsangYong
XC90ModelChairman
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2783 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
272 HPPower220 HP
380 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank80 lt
18,5 ltUrban consumption17,1 lt
9,6 ltExtra-urban consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/65 R17Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength5355 mm
1890 mmWidth1825 mm
1740 mmHeight1475 mm
2100 KgWeight1750 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase3200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo XC90 and 2003 SsangYong Chairman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…