DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Volvo XC90 vs 2011 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeJeep
XC90ModelCompass
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h10,90 s
190 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
185 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque320 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank51 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4798 mmLength4448 mm
1898 mmWidth1812 mm
1743 mmHeight1718 mm
2080 KgWeight1680 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Volvo XC90 and 2011 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…