DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Volvo XC90 vs 2008 Citroen C6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeCitroen
XC90ModelC6
2008Model year2008
SUVBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
190 km/hTop speed217 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
185 HPPower170 HP
400 NmTorque370 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank72 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/55 R17; 245/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4798 mmLength4908 mm
1898 mmWidth1860 mm
1743 mmHeight1464 mm
2080 KgWeight1821 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Volvo XC90 and 2008 Citroen C6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…