DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Volvo XC90 vs 2006 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeLand Rover
XC90ModelFreelander
2007Model year2006
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
190 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
185 HPPower177 HP
400 NmTorque240 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears4
—Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4798 mmLength4433 mm
1898 mmWidth1809 mm
1743 mmHeight1709 mm
2080 KgWeight1550 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Volvo XC90 and 2006 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…