DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Volvo XC90 vs 2016 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationFord Kuga
VolvoMakeFord
XC90ModelKuga
2007Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationFord Kuga
11,5 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
185 HPPower182 HP
400 NmTorque240 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationFord Kuga
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationFord Kuga
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationFord Kuga
4798 mmLength4531 mm
1898 mmWidth1838 mm
1743 mmHeight1703 mm
2080 KgWeight1686 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Volvo XC90 and 2016 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…