DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo XC90 vs 2004 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeFord
XC90ModelFocus
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
185 km/hTop speed193 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
163 HPPower153 HP
340 NmTorque209 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank53 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength4450 mm
1890 mmWidth1699 mm
1740 mmHeight1430 mm
2095 KgWeight1280 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo XC90 and 2004 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…