DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Volvo XC90 vs 2010 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeNissan
XC90ModelX-Trail
2011Model year2010
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
190 km/hTop speed194 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
163 HPPower169 HP
340 NmTorque233 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption13,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,7 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4630 mm
1936 mmWidth1785 mm
1743 mmHeight1685 mm
—Weight1469 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Volvo XC90 and 2010 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…