DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo XC90 vs 2010 Volvo XC70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeVolvo
XC90ModelXC70
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeEstate
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
163 HPPower175 HP
340 NmTorque420 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption9,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4838 mm
1936 mmWidth1861 mm
1743 mmHeight1604 mm
—Weight1742 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo XC90 and 2010 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…