DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo XC90 vs 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler PT Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeChrysler
XC90ModelPT Cruiser
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeEstate
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
190 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2429 cc
163 HPPower182 HP
340 NmTorque285 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank57 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength4290 mm
1936 mmWidth1705 mm
1743 mmHeight1600 mm
—Weight1450 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2616 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo XC90 and 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler PT Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…