DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Volvo XC90 vs 2005 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S40
VolvoMakeVolvo
XC90ModelS40
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S40
11,8 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
163 HPPower140 HP
340 NmTorque220 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S40
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationVolvo S40
4807 mmLength4476 mm
1936 mmWidth1770 mm
1784 mmHeight1454 mm
2141 KgWeight1400 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Volvo XC90 and 2005 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…