DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volvo XC90 vs 2017 Volkswagen Arteon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Arteon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeVolkswagen
XC90ModelArteon
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

5,6 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
320 HPPower280 HP
400 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption9,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
2,1 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears7 DSG
—Tyre size245/45 R18; 245/40 R19; 245/35 R20
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4862 mm
1923 mmWidth1871 mm
1776 mmHeight1450 mm
2319 KgWeight1716 Kg
2984 mmWheelbase2837 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volvo XC90 and 2017 Volkswagen Arteon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Arteon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…