DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo XC90 vs 2017 Volkswagen Golf Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Golf

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeVolkswagen
XC90ModelGolf
2016Model year2017
SUVBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

6,5 s0–100 km/h5,1 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
320 HPPower310 HP
400 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
8 AutomaticGears6
—Tyre size225/40 R18; 235/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4263 mm
1923 mmWidth1799 mm
1776 mmHeight1465 mm
2078 KgWeight1408 Kg
2984 mmWheelbase2626 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo XC90 and 2017 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Golf leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…