DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volvo XC90 vs 2016 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC90SpecificationKTM X-Bow
VolvoMakeKTM
XC90ModelX-Bow
2017Model year2016
SUVBody typeRoadster
5/7Seats2
5Doors—

Performance

Volvo XC90SpecificationKTM X-Bow
7,9 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
215 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
250 HPPower240 HP
350 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC90SpecificationKTM X-Bow
PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC90SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
—Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

Volvo XC90SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4950 mmLength3738 mm
1923 mmWidth1915 mm
1776 mmHeight1202 mm
—Weight790 Kg
2984 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volvo XC90 and 2016 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…