2007 • Volvo
XC70
Volvo XC70 3.2 (238 Hp) 2007Overall Score73.75/100
2007 Volvo XC70 vs 2007 Toyota Blade Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2007 • Toyota
Blade
Toyota Blade 3.4 24V6 (280 Hp) 2007Overall Score74.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Blade
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
73.75–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo XC70SpecificationToyota Blade
VolvoMakeToyota
XC70ModelBlade
2007Model year2007
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo XC70SpecificationToyota Blade
8,6 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
215 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
238 HPPower280 HP
320 NmTorque206 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo XC70SpecificationToyota Blade
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo XC70SpecificationToyota Blade
4838 mmLength4220 mm
1861 mmWidth1760 mm
1604 mmHeight1515 mm
—Weight1250 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2007 Volvo XC70 and 2007 Toyota Blade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableJeep Commander vs Volvo XC702007 and 2007 model yearsVSImage unavailableToyota Blade vs Volvo XC702007 and 2007 model years
VSImage unavailableKia Carnival vs Volvo XC702007 and 2007 model years
VSImage unavailableDodge Charger vs Volvo XC702007 and 2007 model years
VSImage unavailableLand Rover Discovery vs Volvo XC702007 and 2007 model yearsComments are loading…