DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Volvo XC70 vs 2002 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeChevrolet
XC70ModelTracker
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
200 HPPower167 HP
285 NmTorque220 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank66 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/65 R16Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4733 mmLength4059 mm
1860 mmWidth1694 mm
1562 mmHeight1689 mm
1630 KgWeight1335 Kg
2763 mmWheelbase2479 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Volvo XC70 and 2002 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…