DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo XC70 vs 2016 Fiat Fullback Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Fullback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeFiat
XC70ModelFullback
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2442 cc
215 HPPower181 HP
420 NmTorque430 Nm
5Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,3 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size245/70 R16; 245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4838 mmLength5285 mm
1870 mmWidth1815 mm
1604 mmHeight1780 mm
1919 KgWeight1875 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo XC70 and 2016 Fiat Fullback approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Fullback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…