DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo XC70 vs 2003 Hyundai XG Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai XG

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeHyundai
XC70ModelXG
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
163 HPPower139 HP
340 NmTorque192 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4733 mmLength4865 mm
1860 mmWidth1825 mm
1562 mmHeight1420 mm
1695 KgWeight1865 Kg
2763 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo XC70 and 2003 Hyundai XG approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai XG leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…