DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo XC70 vs 2016 BMW 4 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeBMW
XC70Model4 Serisi
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
205 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
181 HPPower184 HP
420 NmTorque270 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size225/50 R17 94W; 225/45 R18; 255/40 R18; 225/40 R19; 255/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4838 mmLength4638 mm
1870 mmWidth1825 mm
1604 mmHeight1384 mm
—Weight1700 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo XC70 and 2016 BMW 4 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…