DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Volvo XC70 vs 2016 Fiat Toro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Toro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC70SpecificationFiat Toro
VolvoMakeFiat
XC70ModelToro
2015Model year2016
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo XC70SpecificationFiat Toro
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2360 cc
181 HPPower186 HP
420 NmTorque244 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC70SpecificationFiat Toro
DieselFuel typePetrol / Ethanol – E85
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC70SpecificationFiat Toro
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears9
215/65 R16Tyre size215/65 R16; 225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC70SpecificationFiat Toro
4838 mmLength4915 mm
1870 mmWidth1844 mm
1604 mmHeight1737 mm
—Weight1704 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2990 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Volvo XC70 and 2016 Fiat Toro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…