DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo XC70 vs 2013 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMitsubishi
XC70ModelASX
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2268 cc
163 HPPower150 HP
400 NmTorque360 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4838 mmLength4295 mm
1870 mmWidth1770 mm
1604 mmHeight1625-1635 mm
1811 KgWeight1545 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo XC70 and 2013 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…