DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo XC70 vs 2013 Toyota Proace Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Proace

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeToyota
XC70ModelProace
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats3
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque340 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4838 mmLength5143 mm
1870 mmWidth1895 mm
1604 mmHeight1980 mm
1727 KgWeight1819-1928 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase3122 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo XC70 and 2013 Toyota Proace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Proace leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…