2012 • Volvo
XC70
Volvo XC70 2.0 D3 (163 Hp) 2012Overall Score64.75/100
2012 Volvo XC70 vs 2012 Mazda MX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mazda
MX-5
Mazda MX-5 2.0 MZR (160 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Mazda MX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo XC70SpecificationMazda MX-5
VolvoMakeMazda
XC70ModelMX-5
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Volvo XC70SpecificationMazda MX-5
10,2 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
0 km/hTop speed213 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
163 HPPower160 HP
400 NmTorque188 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo XC70SpecificationMazda MX-5
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo XC70SpecificationMazda MX-5
4838 mmLength4020 mm
1870 mmWidth1720 mm
1604 mmHeight1245 mm
1727 KgWeight1165 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2330 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo XC70 and 2012 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableCitroen C4 vs Volvo XC702012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableCitroen Jumpy vs Volvo XC702012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailablePeugeot 3008 vs Volvo XC702012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailablePeugeot 5008 vs Volvo XC702012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Orlando vs Volvo XC702012 and 2012 model yearsComments are loading…