DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volvo XC60 vs 2008 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC60SpecificationSaab 9-3
VolvoMakeSaab
XC60Model9-3
2009Model year2008
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo XC60SpecificationSaab 9-3
7,5 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
210 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2953 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
285 HPPower250 HP
400 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC60SpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
17,3 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
11,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC60SpecificationSaab 9-3
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC60SpecificationSaab 9-3
4627 mmLength4635 mm
1888 mmWidth1762 mm
1713 mmHeight1466 mm
1874 KgWeight1555 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volvo XC60 and 2008 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…