DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo XC60 vs 2003 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 12.25 points.

80.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeRenault
XC60ModelLaguna
2016Model year2003
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
210 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
254 HPPower207 HP
360 NmTorque285 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption14,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4644 mmLength4576 mm
1891 mmWidth1772 mm
1713 mmHeight1429 mm
1816-1935 KgWeight1505 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2740 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo XC60 and 2003 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 12.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…