DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volvo XC60 vs 2017 Fiat Fullback Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Fullback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeFiat
XC60ModelFullback
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed177 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2442 cc
220 HPPower181 HP
420 NmTorque430 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4644 mmLength5305 mm
1891 mmWidth1815 mm
1713 mmHeight1780 mm
1834-1921 KgWeight1950 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volvo XC60 and 2017 Fiat Fullback approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Fullback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…