DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Volvo XC60 vs 2015 Volkswagen Scirocco Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeVolkswagen
XC60ModelScirocco
2015Model year2015
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
210 km/hTop speed238 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
220 HPPower211 HP
420 NmTorque280 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionDSG
—Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4644 mmLength4256 mm
1891 mmWidth1810 mm
1713 mmHeight1406 mm
1834-1921 KgWeight1393 kg
—Luggage capacity312 lt
2774 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Volvo XC60

No additional feature records are available.

Volkswagen SciroccoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistAuto HoldTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing Camera

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Volvo XC60 and 2015 Volkswagen Scirocco approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…