2009 • Volvo
XC60
Volvo XC60 2.4 D5 (205 Hp) 2009Overall Score70.75/100
2009 Volvo XC60 vs 2009 Mazda CX-7 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Mazda
CX-7
Mazda CX-7 2.3 16V turbo 4 WD 6A/T (238) 2009Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-7
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo XC60SpecificationMazda CX-7
VolvoMakeMazda
XC60ModelCX-7
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo XC60SpecificationMazda CX-7
8,5 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
0 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
205 HPPower238 HP
420 NmTorque350 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo XC60SpecificationMazda CX-7
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank69 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption15,3 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo XC60SpecificationMazda CX-7
4627 mmLength4675 mm
1888 mmWidth1872 mm
1713 mmHeight1645 mm
1827 KgWeight1802 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2750 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Volvo XC60 and 2009 Mazda CX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableBuick Regal vs Volvo XC602009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableHyundai Sonata vs Volvo XC602009 and 2009 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableAcura TSX vs Volvo XC602009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableHonda Accord vs Volvo XC602009 and 2009 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableLexus IS vs Volvo XC602009 and 2009 model yearsComments are loading…