DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo XC60 vs 2016 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMitsubishi
XC60ModelTriton
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
163 HPPower136 HP
420 NmTorque324 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4644 mmLength5280 mm
1891 mmWidth1815 mm
1713 mmHeight1780 mm
1911 KgWeight1820 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo XC60 and 2016 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…