DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo XC60 vs 2015 Volkswagen Eos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeVolkswagen
XC60ModelEos
2013Model year2015
SUVBody typeCoupe - Cabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
210 km/hTop speed238 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
245 HPPower210 HP
350 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
—Tyre size215/55 R16; 235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4644 mmLength4423 mm
1891 mmWidth1791 mm
1713 mmHeight1444 mm
1816-1935 KgWeight1563 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo XC60 and 2015 Volkswagen Eos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…