DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo XC60 vs 2013 BMW Z4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC60SpecificationBMW Z4
VolvoMakeBMW
XC60ModelZ4
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Volvo XC60SpecificationBMW Z4
7,2 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
210 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
245 HPPower184 HP
350 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC60SpecificationBMW Z4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC60SpecificationBMW Z4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
—Tyre size225/45 R17 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC60SpecificationBMW Z4
4644 mmLength4239 mm
1891 mmWidth1790 mm
1713 mmHeight1291 mm
1816-1935 KgWeight1470 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2496 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo XC60 and 2013 BMW Z4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…