DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Volvo XC60 vs 2014 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC60SpecificationMazda 3
VolvoMakeMazda
XC60Model3
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo XC60SpecificationMazda 3
11,2 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
190 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower120 HP
350 NmTorque210 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC60SpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank51 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC60SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC60SpecificationMazda 3
4644 mmLength4460 mm
1891 mmWidth1795 mm
1713 mmHeight1450 mm
1826 KgWeight1205 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Volvo XC60 and 2014 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…