2016 • Volvo
V90
Volvo V90 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2016Overall Score69.75/100
2016 Volvo V90 vs 2016 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Volkswagen
Caddy
Volkswagen Caddy 2.0 TDI (150 Hp) 2016Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Caddy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V90SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
VolvoMakeVolkswagen
V90ModelCaddy
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeMinivan, Kombi
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V90SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
10,2 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
205 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V90SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V90SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V90SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
4936 mmLength4878 mm
1879 mmWidth1793 mm
1475 mmHeight1831 mm
—Weight1600 Kg
2941 mmWheelbase3006 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Volvo V90 and 2016 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…