2013 • Volvo
V70
Volvo V70 3.2 (243 Hp) 2013Overall Score73.75/100
2013 Volvo V70 vs 2015 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 Hp) 2015Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Volvo V70
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V70SpecificationFord Ranger
VolvoMakeFord
V70ModelRanger
2013Model year2015
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V70SpecificationFord Ranger
8,4 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
235 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement3198 cc
243 HPPower200 HP
320 NmTorque470 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V70SpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V70SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V70SpecificationFord Ranger
4823 mmLength5359 mm
—Width1850 mm
1547 mmHeight1815 mm
1567 KgWeight2073 Kg
2816 mmWheelbase3220 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Volvo V70 and 2015 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…