DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Volvo V70 vs 2004 Toyota Mark II Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeToyota
V70ModelMark II
2005Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2319 ccEngine displacement2492 cc
250 HPPower280 HP
330 NmTorque378 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption20 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption12 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4735 mm
1804 mmWidth1760 mm
1465 mmHeight1460 mm
1615 KgWeight1570 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Volvo V70 and 2004 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…