DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo V70 vs 2009 Mazda CX-7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V70SpecificationMazda CX-7
VolvoMakeMazda
V70ModelCX-7
2004Model year2009
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V70SpecificationMazda CX-7
7,1 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
250 km/hTop speed211 km/h
2319 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
250 HPPower260 HP
330 NmTorque380 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V70SpecificationMazda CX-7
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank69 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption14 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption10,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V70SpecificationMazda CX-7
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/55 R16Tyre size235/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V70SpecificationMazda CX-7
4710 mmLength4700 mm
1804 mmWidth1870 mm
1465 mmHeight1645 mm
1615 KgWeight1740 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo V70 and 2009 Mazda CX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…