1997 • Volvo
V70
Volvo V70 2.4 T (200 Hp) 1997Overall Score67.5/100
1997 Volvo V70 vs 1997 Ford Contour Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Ford
Contour
Ford Contour 2.5i 24V GL (165 Hp) 1997Overall Score68.25/100
WINNER
Ford Contour
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V70SpecificationFord Contour
VolvoMakeFord
V70ModelContour
1997Model year1997
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V70SpecificationFord Contour
8,6 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
200 HPPower165 HP
285 NmTorque217 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V70SpecificationFord Contour
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank61 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption—
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,5 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V70SpecificationFord Contour
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R14V
YesABS—
Dimensions
Volvo V70SpecificationFord Contour
4733 mmLength4658 mm
1860 mmWidth1749 mm
1562 mmHeight1374 mm
1630 KgWeight1400 Kg
2763 mmWheelbase2704 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Volvo V70 and 1997 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…