DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Volvo V70 vs 2002 Jaguar X-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeJaguar
V70ModelX-type
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2099 cc
163 HPPower156 HP
340 NmTorque196 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank61 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption12,7 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4672 mm
1804 mmWidth1789 mm
1488 mmHeight1430 mm
1647 KgWeight1450 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Volvo V70 and 2002 Jaguar X-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…