2013 • Volvo
V70
Volvo V70 1.6 D2 (115 Hp) 2013Overall Score60.25/100
2013 Volvo V70 vs 2013 Honda CR-Z Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Honda
CR-Z
Honda CR-Z 1.5 i-VTEC (114Hp) 2013Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Volvo V70
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V70SpecificationHonda CR-Z
VolvoMakeHonda
V70ModelCR-Z
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors3
Performance
Volvo V70SpecificationHonda CR-Z
11,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
115 HPPower114 HP
270 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V70SpecificationHonda CR-Z
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption6,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V70SpecificationHonda CR-Z
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V70SpecificationHonda CR-Z
4814 mmLength4078 mm
1907 mmWidth2013 mm
1547 mmHeight1395 mm
—Weight1147 Kg
2816 mmWheelbase2435 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Volvo V70 and 2013 Honda CR-Z approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…