2010 • Volvo
V60
Volvo V60 2.4 D5 (215 Hp) 2010Overall Score70.75/100
2010 Volvo V60 vs 2010 Mazda CX-7 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mazda
CX-7
Mazda CX-7 2.3 16V turbo 4 WD 6A/T (238) 2010Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-7
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V60SpecificationMazda CX-7
VolvoMakeMazda
V60ModelCX-7
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V60SpecificationMazda CX-7
7,7 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
0 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
215 HPPower238 HP
440 NmTorque350 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V60SpecificationMazda CX-7
DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank69 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption15,3 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo V60SpecificationMazda CX-7
4628 mmLength4675 mm
1865 mmWidth1872 mm
1484 mmHeight1645 mm
1631 KgWeight1802 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2750 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Volvo V60 and 2010 Mazda CX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…