DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo V60 vs 2004 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points.

62.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeRenault
V60ModelMegane
2012Model year2004
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
0 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
180 HPPower101 HP
240 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4628 mmLength4209 mm
1865 mmWidth1777 mm
1484 mmHeight1458 mm
1537 KgWeight1195 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo V60 and 2004 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…