DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo V60 vs 2012 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSubaru
V60ModelForester
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
240 NmTorque198 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4628 mmLength4595 mm
1865 mmWidth1795 mm
1484 mmHeight1735 mm
1537 KgWeight1469 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo V60 and 2012 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…